The Right Or Privilege Of Voting - 970 Words

Many people of the modern day take for granted their right to vote. Assuming that it was a natural god given right that has been around since the dawn of politics, but that is not the case. Politics of the early to late 1800’s was paved with a road of tears, regret, blood, sweat, and most of all inequality. To understand some of the pitfalls and struggles some had faced, you must first understand some key concepts and terms. When referring to voting you may hear the terms franchise and suffrage come up quite often. Although both intertwine, they both have slightly different meanings. As defined in Wikipedia suffrage is the right or privilege of voting. Franchise is defined as the privilege or right granted by law, especially the right to vote in the election of public officials. Along this road of suffrage, there were some amendments that helped solidified the process. The issues of suffrage mostly involved African Americans. Without some of the following amendments, they would have never been given the right to vote. The first amendment that brought about major change was the 15th amendment. This amendment states that there will be no bar to vote based upon race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Although there were many ways states tried to work around this, this amendment was the first big step towards equality. The second amendment that bridged the gap of suffrage amongst Americans was the 19th amendment. This amendment was geared towards equal voting rights forShow MoreRelatedIs Voting A Right Or A Privilege?1993 Words   |  8 PagesWhen determining the criteria for a person to lose voting privileges based on them being classified a felon, I believe we should examine the circumstances surrounding them becoming a felon. If a person is committing a felony for purposes other than intentionally breaking the law this should make an impac t on the punishment. I think that what any reasonable person would have done in the circumstances of the offender should be taken into account by the Arkansas State Legislation. Criminal disenfranchisementRead MorePersuasive Speech : Bad Officials Are The Ones Elected By Good Citizens Who Do Not Vote 812 Words   |  4 Pagesreligious belief, and sexual orientation have the privilege to vote. What is sad about it is that they chose not vote. The power of voting in society is a privilege that most of us take advantage of. Why is it that we complain about having bad governors, presidents, and unwanted laws, and still chose not to vote? Do we not understand that we do have a voice and can use it to make our lives better? At one point in time, both men and women fought for their right to vote, because they had no voice. Was itRead MoreShould Felons Be Allowed to Vote? Essay794 Words   |  4 Pagespermanently restrict felons from voting while Vermont and Maine allow felons to vote while in prison. Proponents of felon re-enfranchisement believe felons who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences should have all of their rights and privi leges restored. They argue that efforts to block ex-felons from voting are unfair, undemocratic, and politically or racially motivated. Opponents of felon voting say the restrictions are consistent with other voting limitations such as age, residencyRead MoreShould Felons Be Abolished?979 Words   |  4 Pages In lawmaking, there must be objective rights and wrongs. If not, than how can the disenfranchisement of nearly six million United States citizens be considered right? If those citizens have been convicted felons, many of which on multiple accounts- is their lack of sound judgement worthy of the right to vote alongside the rest of the law-abiding population? Many polls show that Americans feel that criminals shouldn’t be punished with disenfranchisement in addition to their initial sentence. SupportersRead MoreThesis1205 Words   |  5 PagesRationale: Electronic Voting for Global Vote for Rights by Children International – Tabaco is joining at the World Children’s Prize. It is an education program for all children. Their goal is to become more humane world, where children’s rights are respected by all. And there will be a new way of voting and to make voting process faster and easier. More than 2000 youth ages 12 – 18 yrs. Old are going to vote, first they will have their registration of the participant, next followed by voting process by ElectronicRead MoreThe Argument For Voting Rights873 Words   |  4 Pagesbecome part of a law-abiding society with the same privileges as others in the society, proponents for voting rights argue.† If they go through these things to become a part of society again, then why are they not allowed the right to vote? This must be an upsetting process for those felons that want to become a part of society again and actually care to make a difference. All that they w ant to do is to be granted one of the basic fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. I mean that’s the least theyRead MoreThe Rights Movement And Civil Rights761 Words   |  4 Pages The right to vote, a power to participate in selecting leaders by ballot, derived from North America’s English origins (Kernell et al. 2014, p. 485). Throughout American History, voting rights began as privilege for those with a certain extent of wealth, a privilege that many had sought and longed for. Due process of many national movements, credited to the women’s suffrage movement and civil rights movement, the right to vote had evolved from the limited amount of eligible voters into a humanRead MoreFelony Disenfranchisement And Its Effects On The State Of Residency843 Words   |  4 Pagesdrastic effects on felons in their state of residency by preventing them from voting. English colonists brought disenfranchisement to America as a punishment for felons’ criminal behavior. Committing a crime showed that they were unfit to be included in political events. There is a lot of controversy about Disenfranchisement laws. Disenfranchisement varies in different states Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote, even when they are incarcerated. With this law that was made a lotRead MorePros And Cons Of Voting837 Words   |  4 PagesVoting is a privilege to do in this country. Until 1920 women could not vote, African Americans could not vote until 1965. There are still people to this day that have never voted. Jury duty is mandatory, why not voting? Voting should be mandatory because as citizens, is a right and a job to be able to decide the future of this country. In the United States, there are amendments regarding voting. The 12th Amendment, ratified in 1804, specified how the president and vice president are elected(Grover)Read MoreVoting Persuasive Essay934 Words   |  4 PagesYou Better Start Voting Currently in the world, there are a total of twenty-two countries where voting is mandatory. All though the most famous of them all is Australia, the majority of them are in South and Central America. Which includes our downstairs neighbor, Mexico. According to ThoughtCo, Voting is a civic duty comparable to other duties citizens perform such as; taxation and compulsory education, or jury duty (ThoughtCo). Although the that statement could not be any clearer, encouraging

Lebron v Kobe Free Essays

People are always looking forward to basketball season. There are many good players in the league. I think that the two best players are Kobe Bryant and Lebron James. We will write a custom essay sample on Lebron v Kobe or any similar topic only for you Order Now Both players perform excellent on the court. Although the players play well, they are totally different athletes. The attitudes, skills, and passion for the game are expressed in different ways. Although, Lebron James is young in the league of NBA basketball, he has the ability to shutdown most all-star veterans. Lebron’s attitude towards basketball hasn’t changed a bit from his high school career. Even though he is in the pros, his mentality is still teamwork. In a game like basketball you can’t do everything by yourself. Many may think he is a one man team or a ball hog but, his attitude towards the game makes himself stand out. On the other hand, Kobe Bryant has had a few more years of experience than Lebron James. In the beginning of his basketball career his attitude was similar to that of Lebron James’ current one. After a couple of years of playing with the same team and winning a variety of championships, his outlook on the sport began to change. Many in which caused controversy with his fellow former teammate Shaquille O’Neal. Lebron James has very exceptional skills in the level that he plays at. Not only did he get drafted directly out of high school but, he is one of the top players that are recognized when one mentions basketball. James has led his team to consecutive playoff appearances from 2006 through 2009. On offense, Lebron is known for using his size, strength, and quickness to get past offenders. His skills have led to many comparisons to NBA legends like Magic Johnson, Oscar Robertson, and Michael Jordan. Kobe Bryant is considered one of the most complete players in NBA history. Kobe has the ability to create shots for himself and is an effective outside shooter. Aside from this, he is a standout defender, having made the All-Defensive first and second team nine of the last ten seasons. The passion each individual has for the game of basketball is different from one another. Lebron James’ perspective on basketball is it’s â€Å"More Than a Game†. Basketball to him is more like a lifestyle in other words. The teamwork he and his teammates show on the court create a sense of brotherhood. Lebron knows that its not all about him because the game of basketball is a team sport. Kobe Bryant’s passion for the game is different. He started playing the sport at the age of 3 years old. Kobe’s father was in the NBA when he was young and had a big influence on him. On the court, he knows it’s a job to be done and he dominates on a regular basis. There are many similarities between Lebron James and Kobe Bryant. In contrast, there are many differences as well. Each individual has a certain way they present their selves on and off the court. One thing for sure, professional basketball would not be the same without them. How to cite Lebron v Kobe, Essay examples

North Or South Who Killed Reconstruction Essay Example For Students

North Or South Who Killed Reconstruction Essay HISTORY 112Neringa KardelyteProfessor C. ReiterWRITING ASSIGNMENT Nr. I North won the Civil War. Throughout the American Civil War, The North proved to be victorious to The South. The Union had a power and wealth, better economy and technology. There were many key factories: the money, the resources, the commanders, the manpower, the skill and determination and the most important the advanced weapons. Civil War was considered the first modern War in the World, because of new advanced weapons- rifled muskets, that cold reach 300 yards. Although, both sides had access to these weapons, North had the larger quantity. Union solders, were free people and some of Confederate solders were slaves, so the did not really care to fight. What were they defeating: slavery? The period after The Civil War was a very difficult time in The United States history. This time was known as The Reconstruction period, it was very controvertible. There were many issues that had to be considered such as what to do with the freed blacks in the South, and how states would be readmitted to the Union. This era saw the rise and fall of the radical Republicans, the government was going through a lot of changes, Southerners had to go through major changes not just in governmental system, they had to change their way of life. Southern way of life was destroyed, slavery was abolished, and residents of the South needed help to rebuild the economy. After the end of Civil War in1865, there was no definite plan for reconstructing the Union. This was a serious matter. In 1863 president Lincoln proposed his ten percent plan, its policy would allow seceding states return to the Union if 10% of their prewar voters took an oath of loyalty to the Union and abolished slavery. The plan did not force states to give equal rights to blacks. Ten percent plan was a good idea, but radical republicans felt, that it is not enough. They wanted equal rights for former slaves and a power of planter class destroyed. Congress formulated a stricter plan of Reconstruction, it proposed that Confederate states would be temporarily ruled by the military governor required half the white adult males to take an oath, and restricted political power to the hard core Unionists in each state. Lincoln vetoed the plan, but his own plan could not succeed without assistance of Congress either. Lincoln finally appeared ready to make concessions to the Radicals. At h is final meeting, he approved placing the defeated South temporarily under military rule. But only a few days later Lincoln was assassinated and Lincolns final Reconstruction plan will never be known. In May of 1865 a new president A. Johnson unveiled his Reconstruction plan. Johnson gave pardons and restored property rights to former landowners if they pledged loyalty to the Union and the Constitution. Johnsons nothing to say about black people rights after the war. 1865 the southern states revised the slave codes into what became known as the black codes. This practically stripped blacks of equal rights and justice. In 1867 Radical Reconstruction began. Under this plan the South was divided into five districts (excluding Tennessee). General headed each of the districts. The main goal of the leaders of the state was to increase voter registration of blacks, and to see that white c confederates did not get back in to the office. During this time many things were done to free blacks in the South. The 13th amendment prohibited slavery in 1865. The Freedmens Bureau was created to assist black people with things such as education and housing. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 defined what civil rights were entitled to all citizens. The 14th amendment ratified in 1868 prohibited states from violating the rights of the citizens. 15th amendment in 1870 gave freedmen a right to vote. Black people still had no choice but to work for white landowners, except for wages, which were wery low. Whites wanted to keep the old system of labor and physical punishment. African Americans refused to work under such condi tions. Convinced that working at your own pace was a part of the freedom, they did not work as hard and as long. Work output declined about 35% in freedom (because of shorter hours and women and children releasing from the fields.). Black men desire their own land and did not wanted to work for wages. These reasons led to sharecropping. Under this arrangement African Americans farmed separate plots of land and then at the end of the year divided a crop on the equal basis, with the white landowner. Sharecropping gave black people more freedom and the feeling of being the owner of the land. Although it was better than working for wages, it was still an exploitative system in which black families often ended up in perpetual debt. .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a , .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .postImageUrl , .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a , .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:hover , .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:visited , .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:active { border:0!important; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:active , .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u9fb7fe4d0ba2e2b8a16674b621ef449a:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Native American Genocide Essay During President Grants second term Congress passed Civil Rights Act of 1875. The last major peace of Reconstruction Legislation. This law prohibited discrimination in the public places. At the same time Congress rejected a ban on segregation in public schools. Even though, the Civil Rights Act was passed the Federal government made very little attempt to enforce a law and most southern states ignored it. Many northerners started disliking Reconstruction. They were tired of the corruption of Southern government and acts of violence between races. They had very little faith in African Americans. Northerners though that it is time to leave South alone. When came the Panic of 1873, the great depression time, people started loosing their jobs and savings. The popularity of the Republicans declined. In1874 Republicans lost 77 seats in Congress and along with them the House of Representatives, for the first time since 1861. After elections turned in to violent acts in 1877 Republicans and Democrats reached an important understanding-The Compromise of 1877. Republicans agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South and do not oppose the new Democratic state governments. Southern Democrats dropped their opposition to new election and pledged to respect African Americans rights. By 1877th the entire South was in the hands of the Redemers (Democrats) as they called themselves. Reconstructio n and republican rule came to the end. During 1880s Redemer governments moved to formalize a new system of segregation or racial separation. The redeemers convinced northerners that Redemer rule would not men political disfranchisement of the freed-people. But they could not succeed, because 14th amendment was in a way. In1883, however, the Supreme Court ruled that hotels and railroads are not private institutions, because private individuals owned them. Soon Jim Crow statutes separated the races in prisons, parks, hotels, restaurants, hospitals and other public places, except streets and stores. 1896, the Court ruled that the policy of segregation is legal and right. Plessy v. Ferguson upheld a Louisiana law requiring segregated railroad facilities. The Court claimed that segregation did not constitute discrimination, as long, as accommodations for both races were equal. Separate, but equal became embedded in the fabric of American law and stayed effective for more than half centur y. Black people, who crossed the color line risked violence, beating, lynching. Birth of freedom was partially realized. Country was united and slavery was banished, thats what Lincolns goal was. On the other hand, the acts of the government in late 1870s and beyond shows that the freedom and equality was ignored and denied to black people. Those acts were totally against new birth of the freedom . Booker T. Washington would probably think, that the Lincolns vision came true and now people of his race just have to be patien and wits will come to understanding. W.E.B. DuBois criticizes white supremacy and demand rights to his people. He understands that if you believe something you need to be heard and stand up for your rights. I dont think, that DuBois thought, that new birth of freedom was realized in its full meaning.